A Reminder of JAS paper refinement

Today, after meeting with Prof. Chang and discussing the key points in the JAS paper, we conclude with several suggestions.

For Me, I should do these following before this weekend (Friday, exactly)

1. Drawing a carton of the classification of track maps.
2. Relationship between \theta, \kappa and the mountain height h_m.
   This should be developed from those SWM cases I've already run and the comparision of DM and SWM.
   
   • For \theta, it is remarkable that we use an unique value for the vortices starting from different latitutes. The value of \theta is ONLY sensitive on the mountain height but non-sensitive with the impinging locations. To do a map with the relationship between the mountain height and the \theta.
     
   • For \kappa, it is remarkable that we use an unique value for the vortices encountering with topography with different height and from different latitudes. The value of \kappa is maybe sensitive with the strengh of the vortex. It is reasonable to say that \kappa is small for strong vortices and \kappa is large for weak vortices. This point should be supported with evidences from more SWM simulations and DM comparisons.
     
3. Try to give attractive discussions of the DM track maps.
   
   • Give better explainations for some of the track maps.
   • What kind of track maps is more significant in practical path predictions ?
     
   • Give them more versitile interpretations of these track maps.
     

For Prof. Chang, he would be able to give an insightful discussion on the DM theory for its general, versitile power on explaining the typhoon motions.

Go ahead ! The question is quite interesting!